Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:46

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Horoscope for Tuesday, June 24, 2025 - chicago.suntimes.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
17 more Rite Aid stores to close in WA, including 4 Bartell Drugs - The Seattle Times
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Is AI secretly replacing your job right now without you knowing it? What do you think? Do you agree?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Hillingdon heraldic designer appointed MBE for royal cypher - BBC
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Presidential Message on National Men’s Health Week, 2025 - The White House (.gov)
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Race and genetics do not line up well, new study confirms - Live Science
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.